<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Insider Risk Management on Heilt ærleg</title><link>https://knutdimmen.no/en/tags/insider-risk-management/</link><description>Recent content in Insider Risk Management on Heilt ærleg</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://knutdimmen.no/en/tags/insider-risk-management/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Risky Agents in Purview: When the agent gets its own identity, it also gets its own risk profile</title><link>https://knutdimmen.no/en/posts/risky-agents-i-purview-agenten-din-er-endeleg-ein-identitet-men-berre-i-preview/</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://knutdimmen.no/en/posts/risky-agents-i-purview-agenten-din-er-endeleg-ein-identitet-men-berre-i-preview/</guid><description>&lt;p>You haven’t just adopted a new Copilot. You’ve brought a new digital actor into the organization.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>That’s perhaps the most important change with agents right now.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>When an agent gets its own identity, access to data, and the ability to perform actions over time, it’s no longer enough to ask who created it or who pressed start. We also need to ask what the agent actually does, what it has access to, whether its behavior changes, and what happens if it starts doing something it shouldn’t.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Insider Risk Management in 2026: when the threat logs in</title><link>https://knutdimmen.no/en/posts/insider-risk-management-og-viktigheta-av-det-i-2026-globale-trusselbilde-mot-sjo/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://knutdimmen.no/en/posts/insider-risk-management-og-viktigheta-av-det-i-2026-globale-trusselbilde-mot-sjo/</guid><description>&lt;p>The big shift in 2026 isn’t just who tries to break in. It’s how often they simply log in.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>For Norwegian organizations, including small ones, this means the line between “external attacker” and “insider risk” has become much less useful in practice. If an employee is phished, or an account is compromised another way, activity quickly looks like legitimate use. Then the question isn’t just whether you stop the break-in. You also have to detect that an apparently normal user suddenly behaves like a risk.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>