<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Identity on Heilt ærleg</title><link>https://knutdimmen.no/en/tags/identity/</link><description>Recent content in Identity on Heilt ærleg</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://knutdimmen.no/en/tags/identity/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>You revoked the session. But did you check if the attacker registered their own device?</title><link>https://knutdimmen.no/en/posts/du-tilbakekalla-sesjonen-men-sjekka-du-om-angriparen-registrerte-si-eiga-eining/</link><pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://knutdimmen.no/en/posts/du-tilbakekalla-sesjonen-men-sjekka-du-om-angriparen-registrerte-si-eiga-eining/</guid><description>&lt;p>One of the things I brought home from Workplace Ninja Summit in Baden was how much the device actually matters to the identity.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>We talk a lot about MFA, passkeys, Conditional Access, and tokens. But the device isn’t just something the user sits in front of when they sign in.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The device can itself become part of the trust chain.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>That point was clear across sessions on modern identity attacks, device trust, passkeys, and privileged workstations. Shortly after the conference, concrete attacks made the issue far less theoretical.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>